Segment
1. Apollo Aspire XP Lowcost2. Fulda SportControl 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Apollo Aspire XP vs. Fulda SportControl 2
Table of contents:
| # | Apollo Aspire XP | Fulda SportControl 2 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R19 | R17 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Here we are reviewing two popular summer tyres, the Apollo Aspire XP and the Fulda SportControl 2. These tyres have been tested extensively and we will compare them based on our rating and results from various tests. Keep in mind, both tyres are manufactured by respected brands - Apollo and Fulda, that have strong reputation in tyre industry.
The Apollo Aspire XP has an overall rating of 53% on our scale. It has a strength in Rolling resistance, being tested in Autobild where it finished 14 out of 53, and in ACE, where it placed impressively 4th out of 9. Furthermore, it impressed with Exterior noise, becoming one of the best in this category in the ACE test. However, not performing exceptionally in other tests, this tyre falls a bit short overall comparing to the competition.
On the other hand, the Fulda SportControl 2 scores much higher on our scale, sitting comfortably at 84%. This tyre boasted many impressive features including Exterior noise, Comfort, and Rolling resistance, as evidenced in the Autobild test where it ranked 12 out of 53. Moreover, it excelled in the ACE test in categories like Dry handling, Wet braking, Wet circle cornering, Wet handling and Wet handling - objective, securing the 3rd place out of 9. These results, along with our high rating, indicate that this tyre provides a solid, well-rounded performance.
In conclusion, when comparing the Apollo Aspire XP and the Fulda SportControl 2, the latter emerges as the clear winner. It performs better in several categories, as well as achieving an overall better position in most tests. This is reflected in our higher rating for the Fulda tyre. Nonetheless, it's worth noting that the Apollo tyre displays great potential in testing, particularly with lower rolling resistance and controlling exterior noise.
If you're considering replacing your current tyres, both models have their strengths and can make a fine choice, but the Fulda SportControl 2 seems to offer a more comprehensive performance overall. Keep in mind that for ultimate decision, personal preferences and weather conditions in your area should also be included.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Apollo Aspire XP 8.56
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Fulda SportControl 2 Exemplary2. Apollo Aspire XP Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Apollo Aspire XP Good2. Fulda SportControl 2 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Price/value
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Fulda SportControl 2 70 dB2. Apollo Aspire XP ? dB
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Apollo Aspire XP Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 Rating: Good | 2 | 2+ | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 61 | 56 | 20 | 8 | 18 | ||
| Apollo Aspire XP Rating: Recommended | 51 | 45 | 17 | 8 | 15 | ||
| Fulda SportControl 2 Rating: Recommended | 61 | 47 | 17 | 8 | 12 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Apollo Aspire XP | 34,7 | 30,3 | |||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 | 34,2 | 31,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Apollo Aspire XP Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2+ | ||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| Apollo Aspire XP | 36,3 | 31 | |||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 | 35,1 | 32 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||