• 8 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

# BFGoodrich Advantage
/76%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
/85%

Add to comparison

DimensionsR14 - R20 R14 - R22
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

In this comparison, we will look at the BFGoodrich Advantage and the Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun, two popular summer tyres. Both options have their strengths and weaknesses, and we will delve into the test results to determine which tyre might suit your needs better.


The BFGoodrich Advantage has an overall rating of 80% on our website. It is a summer tyre that does not have a newer model replacing it. The strengths of the Advantage are its comfort and dry handling, with the Autobild test giving it high marks in these areas. However, the tyre performs less optimally in wet conditions, with reports of understeering and extended braking distances on wet surfaces - this can be seen in the Autobild test results of 2022. The BFGoodrich Advantage placed 21st out of 50 tyres in the ADAC test, 18th out of 53 in Autobild, and 9th out of 10 in Autozeitung.


On the other hand, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun has a rating of 87% on our website and is specifically designed as a touring summer tyre. It is made in Turkey and like the BFGoodrich Advantage, does not have a newer tyre replacing it. The ZIEX ZE310 excels in aquaplaning resistance, wet braking, and comfort, as demonstrated by its performance in the Autobild and Firmenauto tests. However, it does have some weaknesses, such as a lower environmental score, inefficiency and sustainability issues, according to the Autobild 2021 test. Additionally, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun has an increased rolling resistance as noted in the Autobild 2022 test. In the mutual tests, it placed 6th out of 50 tyres in the ADAC test, 8th out of 53 in Autobild, 8th out of 10 in Autozeitung, and 9th out of 11 in Firmenauto.


When comparing both tyres, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun generally ranks higher in the tests, indicating better overall performance. Notably, it outperforms the BFGoodrich Advantage in wet conditions, which can be considered crucial for safety during the rainy season. However, the BFGoodrich Advantage might be a more comfortable choice for some drivers due to its focus on comfort and dry handling. Ultimately, the choice between these two tyres will depend on your preferences and driving conditions.


For additional information and test results, visit the respective manufacturers' websites: BFGoodrich and Falken.

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Name Enviromental impactDriving safety
Best values in test1,31,8
BFGoodrich Advantage
Rating: Good
2,82,9
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Rating: Good
2,72,1
Show test details
Name WetDryRunning costs
Best values in test12+1+
BFGoodrich Advantage
Rating: Good
2-2+ 2-
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Rating: Good
1- 2+ 2-
Show test details
Name WetDry
Best values in test146134
BFGoodrich Advantage
Rating: Sufficient
108108
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Rating: Satisfactory
120104
Show test details
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test35,727,5
BFGoodrich Advantage36,331
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun36,128,2
Show test details
Name Points totalWetDryRolling resistanceNoise
Best values in test8,98,98,71010
BFGoodrich Advantage
Rating: Satisfactory
7,68,07,577
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Rating: Satisfactory
7,07,86,937
Show test details
Name WetDryRunning costs
Best values in test1-2+1
BFGoodrich Advantage
Rating: Satisfactory
2-2+ 2-
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Rating: Satisfactory
2-22
Show test details
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test34,129,6
BFGoodrich Advantage36,731,9
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun35,831,4
Show test details