10 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (80%) than BFGoodrich (67%). In this particular case, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 has a better rating of 98% compared to 89% of the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2. The first tyre test of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 was done in 2017, compared to 2020 when was the Continental WinterContact TS 870 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2022 185/65 R15 test, where both the G-FORCE WINTER 2 and the WinterContact TS 870 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 88% of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Continental WinterContact TS 870 also have B wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the G-FORCE WINTER 2 is made in Romania/Poland and WinterContact TS 870 is made in France.

#	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /89%	Continental WinterContact TS 870 /98%

Dimensions	R14 - R19	R14 - R17
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Premium

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 52

Number of tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 19x

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 13x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.

Worst position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 4.

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 11.

Average position in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.38

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 5.63

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2023

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 2023

Best rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Very good

Worst rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Good

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870
78%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
71%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 87%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 74%

Wet braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 77%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 84%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 75%

Wet handling

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 79%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 78%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870
81%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%

Dry braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 71%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

Dry handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 87%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 70%

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
89%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870
84%

Snow traction

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 77%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 74%

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 84%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 77%

Snow handling

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 87%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 81%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870
81%

Exterior noise

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 89%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 84%

Comfort

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 78%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 73%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69 dB

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 ? dB

Costs

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870
87%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
64%

Rolling resistance

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 91%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 53%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 ?

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870
72%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

ADAC Winter tyre test 2022 185/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Rolling resistance	Noise	Wear
Best values in test	1,7	1,9	1,8	1,9	1,7	2,5	1,5
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2,7	2,6	2,0	2,5	2,4	2,7	2,0
Continental WinterContact TS 870 Rating: Good	2,1	2,3	2,2	2,5	1,8	3,0	2,0
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Wear
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	1-	1
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2	3+	1-	3+	2
Continental WinterContact TS 870 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2	1-	2+	1
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,1	27,3
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,6	27,9
Continental WinterContact TS 870	34,2	27,7
Show test details

AutoMotorSport Winter tyre test 2021 195/55 R16

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	8,7	9,6	9,3	10	10	10
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	7,8	6,6	7,4	10	5	9
Continental WinterContact TS 870 Rating: Very good	8,2	7,9	7,9	8,4	10	10
Show test details

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands