• 7 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Nokian WR D4

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (76%) than BFGoodrich (55%). In this particular case, the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 has a better rating of 88% compared to 86% of the Nokian WR D4. The first tyre test of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 was done in 2017, compared to 2015 when was the Nokian WR D4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/50 R17 test, where both the G-FORCE WINTER 2 and the WR D4 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (97%) of the Nokian WR D4 also have B wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the G-FORCE WINTER 2 is made in Romania/Poland and WR D4 is made in Finland.

# BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
/88%
Nokian WR D4
/86%
DimensionsR14 - R19 R13 - R20
PriceSet your car's tyre size
TypeWinter Winter
SegmentUpper-middle Upper-middle
Tested14x 26x
Best place1. 225/50 R17 Autobild 20172. 185/65 R15 ACE 2018
Worst place11. 205/55 R16 Autobild 202114. 195/65 R15 Autobild 2018
Average place5.36 6.04
Last test2022 2018
Best ratingVery good 225/50 R17 AutoMotorSport 2020Highly recommended 185/65 R15 Autozeitung 2015
Worst ratingGood 195/55 R16 AutoMotorSport 2021Recommended 215/60 R17 AutoMotorSport 2016
Snow94.9 %91.7 %
Snow traction91.3% 89.4%
Snow handling92.2% 91.4%
Snow braking91.8% 90.6%
Snow cornering91% 93.5%
Snow braking95.3% -
Snow handling - objective100% 93.5%
Snow safety100% -
Wet70.5 %71.4 %
Aquaplaning - cross73.1% 73.4%
Wet braking68.5% 69.8%
Wet handling68.8% 69.1%
Aquaplaning - longitudal84.7% 75.6%
Wet circle cornering67.8% 72.1%
Wet handling - objective60% 70%
Wet safety70% -
Dry71.1 %79.9 %
Dry braking72.5% 80.9%
Dry handling66.6% 77.7%
Dry handling - objective75% 81.5%
Dry lane changing65% 90%
Dry steering response77.5% 75%
Safety78% 73.7%
Dry driving behavior73% 71.5%
Costs79.7 %81.2 %
Rolling resistance73.1% 99.3%
Price/value74% 78.5%
Mileage78.3% 79%
Wear80% 63.5%
Fuel efficiency93% 85.5%
Comfort81.5 %70.9 %
Exterior noise86.3% 68.9%
Comfort77.4% 70.5%
Interior noise81% 69%
Ice81 %83.3 %
Ice braking79.5% 85.2%
Ice lateral guidance81% 81.7%

Mutual tests

Name WetDrySnowRunning costs
Best values in test1-2+11-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
Rating: Good
22-1 2
Nokian WR D4
Rating: Satisfactory
22-23+
Show test details
Source:
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test32,225,9
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
Rating: -
35,125,9
Nokian WR D4
Rating: -
3527,7
Show test details
Source: