• 8 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2 vs. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Kumho allround tyres are slightly better rated (77%) than BFGoodrich (74%). In this particular case, the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S has a better rating of 76% compared to 74% of the BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2. The first tyre test of BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2 was done in 2017, compared to 2020 when was the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 225/50 R17 test, where both the G-Grip All Season 2 and the HA32 Solus 4S were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 89% of BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (93%) of the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S also have B wet ratings.

# BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2
/74%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
/76%

Add to comparison

DimensionsR14 - R19 R13 - R20
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test37,650
BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 24255,9
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S41,554,4
Show test details
Name WetDrySnowRunning costs
Best values in test12+11
BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2
Rating: Good
2-21 2
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
Rating: Satisfactory
222+3
Show test details
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test39,745
BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 243,151
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S44,349,3
Show test details