• 10 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Nokian WR D3

Table of contents:

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (52%) than Bridgestone (46%). In this particular case, the Nokian WR D3 has a better rating of 47% compared to 37% of the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2015 185/60 R15 test, where both the Blizzak LM-001 and the WR D3 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 73% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (56%) of the Nokian WR D3 also have B wet ratings. We also know where Blizzak LM-001 is made - Poland.

# Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
/37%
 		Nokian WR D3
/47%

Add to comparison

New comparison
DimensionsR14 - R21 R13 - R17
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2015 185/60 R15
Name WetDrySnowRunning costs
Best values in test12+11
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
Rating: -		2-2-2+1-
Nokian WR D3
Rating: -		2-22+2+
Show test details
Autobild Winter tyre test 2015 185/60 R15
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test36,827,7
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-00143,428,1
Nokian WR D342,728,2
Show test details