• 7 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than Bridgestone (76%). In this particular case, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 has a better rating of 91% compared to 90% of the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 was done in 2019, compared to 2020 when was the Continental WinterContact TS 870 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Tyre Reviews 2022 225/45 R17 test, where both the Blizzak LM-005 and the WinterContact TS 870 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 98% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has A wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Continental WinterContact TS 870 has B rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Blizzak LM-005 is made in Italy/Hungary/Poland and WinterContact TS 870 is made in France.

# Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
/90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
/91%

Add to comparison

DimensionsR14 - R22 R14 - R17
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Name
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Rating: Test winner
Continental WinterContact TS 870
Rating: Highly recommended
Show test details
Name Points totalWetDrySnow
Best values in test103,6108,3100,2102,1
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005103,5108100,2 101,8
Continental WinterContact TS 870103,6 108,3 99,7102,1
Show test details
Name Points total
Best values in test100
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-00599.7
Continental WinterContact TS 870100
Show test details
Name WetDrySnow
Best values in test147143147
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Rating: Highly recommended
145136122
Continental WinterContact TS 870
Rating: Test winner
147 136147
Show test details
Name WetDrySnowIceRolling resistanceNoiseWear
Best values in test1,71,91,81,91,72,51,5
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Rating: Satisfactory
1,7 2,12,42,81,92,93,0
Continental WinterContact TS 870
Rating: Good
2,12,32,22,51,83,02,0
Show test details
Name WetDrySnowIceRolling resistanceNoiseWear
Best values in test2,01,81,41,81,52,71,5
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Rating: Satisfactory
2,0 1,8 2,72,42,13,42,5
Continental WinterContact TS 870
Rating: Good
2,12,41,61,92,12,82,5
Show test details
Name WetDrySnowRolling resistanceWear
Best values in test2+2+11-1
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Rating: Good
1-21 22+
Continental WinterContact TS 870
Rating: Exemplary
2+ 21- 2+1
Show test details
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test32,127,3
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-00532,1 28,1
Continental WinterContact TS 87034,227,7
Show test details
Name Points totalWinterWetDryRolling resistance
Best values in test1102301,21501,21202,4109,6
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-0051097300,69497,39196,8102,4
Continental WinterContact TS 8701102 301,21 501,21 200100
Show test details
Name Points totalWetDrySnowRolling resistanceNoise
Best values in test8,79,69,3101010
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Rating: Very good
8,7 9,6 8,68,287
Continental WinterContact TS 870
Rating: Very good
8,27,97,98,410 10
Show test details
Name Points totalWinterWetDryRolling resistanceNoise
Best values in test101,6299,9299,9100101,1100,7
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005100285,8299,8100 87,699,8
Continental WinterContact TS 870101,6 299,9 299,9 93,8101,1 100,7
Show test details