10 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Fulda Kristall Control HP2

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda). Generally, Fulda winter tyres are slightly better rated (55%) than Bridgestone (46%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has a better rating of 92% compared to 76% of the Fulda Kristall Control HP2. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 was done in 2019, compared to 2017 when was the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/60 R16 test, where both the Blizzak LM-005 and the Kristall Control HP2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 98% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has A wet grip rating, whereas 60% of Fulda Kristall Control HP2 has B rating. We also know where Blizzak LM-005 is made - Italy/Hungary/Poland.

#	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 /92%	Fulda Kristall Control HP2 /76%

Dimensions	R14 - R22	R15 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 213

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 51

Number of tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 47x

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 20x

Best position in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 1.

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 2.

Worst position in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 15.

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 23.

Average position in tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 3.21

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 11.05

Year of the last test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 2023

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 2023

Best rating in test

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Exemplary

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good

Worst rating in test

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Satisfactory

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended

Snow

(Overall rating)

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2
83%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
80%

Snow braking

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 89%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

Snow traction

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 87%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

Snow handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 89%

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 66%

Snow cornering

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 72%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
85%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2
67%

Wet braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 89%

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 55%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 82%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 81%

Wet handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 62%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 94%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 80%

Wet circle cornering

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 87%

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 64%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
80%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2
71%

Dry braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 76%

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 66%

Dry handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 91%

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 71%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
81%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2
78%

Exterior noise

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 70%

Comfort

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 86%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 78%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 72 dB

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ? dB

Costs

(Overall rating)

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2
81%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
71%

Rolling resistance

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 81%

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 77%

Mileage

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 81%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 68%

Price/value

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 85%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 63%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 ?

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
71%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2
66.5%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

ADAC Winter tyre test 2023 205/60 R16

Name	Enviromental impact	Driving safety
Best values in test	2	2.1
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good	3.1	2.1
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	2	2.9
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2023 225/45 R18

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	31,4	29,2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	31,4	30,9
Fulda Kristall Control HP2	37,4	30,7
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,8	25,4
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	32,8	26,3
Fulda Kristall Control HP2	36,8	26,3
Show test details

Autozeitung Winter tyre test 2022 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	147	143	147
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Highly recommended	145	136	122
Fulda Kristall Control HP2	96	110	142
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Wear
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	1-	1
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good	1-	2	1	2	2+
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	3+	2-	2	1
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2021 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear
Best values in test	1,6	1,9	1,5	2,1	2,7	1,5
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory	1,6	1,9	2,8	2,4	3,3	3,0
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	3,0	3,2	2,4	2,5	3,7	2,5
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,1	27,3
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	32,1	28,1
Fulda Kristall Control HP2	36,8	28,6
Show test details

ACE Winter tyre test 2020 225/50 R17

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	200	67	48	60	18	9
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Highly recommended	200	64	47	60	17	7
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Recommended	177	56	45	57	16	3
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 245/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	1-	2+	1-
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2+	1-	2
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Good	2-	2-	2+	2+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 245/45 R18

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	30,3	24,3
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	30,3	24,5
Fulda Kristall Control HP2	36,3	24,5
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	1-
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Exemplary	1-	2	2	2
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Good	2-	2-	2+	2-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	29,2	24
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	29,2	24,6
Fulda Kristall Control HP2	33,5	24,3
Show test details

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Fulda Kristall Control HP2

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands