Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Premium
Comparison: Bridgestone Turanza T001 vs. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Bridgestone (69%). In this particular case, the Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 has a better rating of 90% compared to 86% of the Bridgestone Turanza T001. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Turanza T001 was done in 2015, compared to 2016 when was the Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2017 215/55 R17 test, where both the Turanza T001 and the ContiPremiumContact 5 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 74% of Bridgestone Turanza T001 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 also have B wet ratings.
| # | Bridgestone Turanza T001 | Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R19 | R15 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
2. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry driving behavior
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel efficiency
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 256 | 131 | 133 | ||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T001 | 224 | 97 | 127 | ||||
| Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 | 249 | 131 | 118 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,5 | 0,5 | 1,5 | 1,6 | ||
| Bridgestone Turanza T001 Rating: Good | 2,1 | 1,7 | 1,9 | 2,5 | 1,9 | ||
| Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Rating: Good | 1,9 | 1,8 | 2,4 | 2,5 | 2,4 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T001 Rating: - | 2+ | 2- | 3+ | ||||
| Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Rating: Exemplary | 2- | 1- | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,6 | 9,7 | 10 | 10 | |||
| Bridgestone Turanza T001 Rating: Satisfactory | 7,1 | 7,8 | 9 | 10 | |||
| Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Rating: Good | 9,6 | 9,2 | 7 | 6 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,6 | 1,0 | 1,7 | 1,6 | ||
| Bridgestone Turanza T001 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,0 | 1,6 | 2,0 | 1,7 | 1,7 | ||
| Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Rating: Good | 2,3 | 1,6 | 2,0 | 3,4 | 2,0 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,6 | 27 | |||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T001 | 36,6 | 28,7 | |||||
| Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 | 34,7 | 30,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||