Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Premium2. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than Bridgestone (57%). In this particular case, the Continental PremiumContact 6 has a better rating of 87% compared to 32% of the Bridgestone Turanza T001. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Turanza T001 was done in 2015, compared to 2017 when was the Continental PremiumContact 6 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/50 R17 test, where both the Turanza T001 and the PremiumContact 6 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 74% of Bridgestone Turanza T001 has B wet grip rating, whereas 89% of Continental PremiumContact 6 has A rating.
# | Bridgestone Turanza T001 | Continental PremiumContact 6 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R15 - R19 | R15 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Premium2. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended2. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Satisfactory
Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1- | 1- | 1 | ||||
Bridgestone Turanza T001 Rating: Good | 1- | 2 | 2- | ||||
Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 1- | 1 | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,1 | 34,6 | |||||
Bridgestone Turanza T001 | 36,2 | 34,6 | |||||
Continental PremiumContact 6 | 34,9 | 35 | |||||
Show test details |