Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Premium2. Vredestein Sportrac 5 Premium
Comparison: Bridgestone Turanza T001 vs. Vredestein Sportrac 5
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (57%) than Vredestein (55%). In this particular case, the Vredestein Sportrac 5 has a better rating of 58% compared to 32% of the Bridgestone Turanza T001. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Turanza T001 was done in 2015, compared to 2016 when was the Vredestein Sportrac 5 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2017 195/65 R15 test, where both the Turanza T001 and the Sportrac 5 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Bridgestone Turanza T001 | Vredestein Sportrac 5 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R19 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
1. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Satisfactory2. Vredestein Sportrac 5 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,5 | 0,5 | 1,5 | 1,6 | ||
| Bridgestone Turanza T001 Rating: Good | 2,1 | 1,7 | 1,9 | 2,5 | 1,9 | ||
| Vredestein Sportrac 5 Rating: Good | 2,8 | 2,6 | 1,0 | 3,2 | 2,0 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T001 Rating: - | 2+ | 2- | 3+ | ||||
| Vredestein Sportrac 5 Rating: Recommended | 2- | 2- | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,6 | 1,0 | 1,7 | 1,6 | ||
| Bridgestone Turanza T001 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,0 | 1,6 | 2,0 | 1,7 | 1,7 | ||
| Vredestein Sportrac 5 Rating: Good | 2,0 | 1,8 | 2,0 | 3,3 | 2,1 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,6 | 27 | |||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T001 | 36,6 | 28,7 | |||||
| Vredestein Sportrac 5 | 37,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||