Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Premium2. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle
Comparison: Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs. Firestone Roadhawk
Table of contents:
| # | Bridgestone Turanza T005 | Firestone Roadhawk | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R22 | R15 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
When comparing the Bridgestone Turanza T005 and Firestone Roadhawk summer tyres, there are some key differences to consider in terms of performance, strengths and weaknesses. Both tyres are produced by reputable manufacturers, with Bridgestone being the parent company of Firestone (Bridgestone / Firestone).
The Bridgestone Turanza T005, a touring tyre, has scored higher overall in our rating system, with an 89% score, when compared to the Firestone Roadhawk's 71%. The Turanza T005 is made in Hungary, Poland, France, and Italy, while the manufacturing location of the Roadhawk remains undisclosed.
In several tests, the Bridgestone Turanza T005 has consistently ranked higher than the Firestone Roadhawk. For example, in the Autoklub ČR test, the Turanza T005 placed 3rd out of 19 tested tyres, with strengths in rolling resistance and wet circle cornering. In comparison, the Roadhawk placed 11th. The ADAC test showed similar results, with the Turanza T005 taking the top spot with strong features in dry and wet braking, wet circle cornering and handling. The Roadhawk, however, placed 5th in the same test.
Text summaries of tests reveal the strengths and weaknesses of each tyre. The Bridgestone Turanza T005 was praised for its balanced performance, strong grip, excellent wet and dry handling, and good aquaplaning properties. However, a potential downside of the Turanza T005 is its limited longevity.
On the other hand, the Firestone Roadhawk has been deemed more effective on dry roads, with low wear and high efficiency (earning a top rating). It appears less balanced, however, with weaknesses on wet roads, and louder noise levels than the Turanza T005.
Autozeitung's test results also favour the Bridgestone Turanza T005, as it ranked 2nd out of 20 tyres, with a strength in wet circle cornering. The Firestone Roadhawk ranked 12th, with a strength in dry steering response.
In conclusion, the Bridgestone Turanza T005 seems to offer better overall performance, particularly in wet conditions, than the Firestone Roadhawk. While both tyres have respective strengths and weaknesses, the Turanza T005 stands out as a more balanced and versatile option for summer driving. For those prioritizing fuel efficiency and dry road performance, the Firestone Roadhawk might be a suitable choice, keeping in mind its limitations on wet roads.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Firestone Roadhawk Exemplary2. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
2. Firestone Roadhawk Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Dry driving behavior
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Firestone Roadhawk 71 dB
Offroad
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Fuel efficiency
Price/value
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 104,7 | 106 | 103,4 | ||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 | 102,4 | 101,3 | 103,4 | ||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Good | 2,4 | 2,2 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Good | 2,7 | 2,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,1 | 1,5 | 2,4 | 1,0 | 1,2 | ||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Good | 2,4 | 1,8 | 2,9 | 2,0 | 1,6 | ||
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Satisfactory | 2,9 | 2,2 | 3,0 | 2,0 | 2,3 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,7 | 1,6 | 2,7 | 1 | 1,7 | ||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Good | 1,7 | 1,8 | 3,3 | 2,5 | 1,9 | ||
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 2,2 | 3,7 | 2,0 | 2,4 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 | 35,8 | 27,5 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 37,7 | 32,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1 | ||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2 | 2- | ||||
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Good | 2+ | 2+ | 3 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 | 35,4 | 31,6 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 35,7 | 31,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,5 | 2,6 | 1,5 | |||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Good | 2,5 | 2,2 | 3,5 | 2,5 | |||
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Poor | 4,9 | 2,8 | 3,0 | 2,5 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 264 | 137 | 129 | ||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Highly recommended | 247 | 118 | 129 | ||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 121 | 75 | 121 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Good | 2+ | 2- | 2+ | ||||
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2- | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 | 35,6 | 30,9 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 35,2 | 32 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,5 | 2,1 | 0,5 | 1,4 | ||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Good | 1,9 | 1,5 | 2,9 | 2,0 | 2,3 | ||
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 1,5 | 2,9 | 2,5 | 2,5 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Good | 1- | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2+ | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,5 | 34,3 | |||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 | 35,7 | 34,3 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 35,2 | 36,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||