In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear). Generally, GoodYear allround tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Bridgestone (67%). In this particular case, the GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 has a better rating of 94% compared to 75% of the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 225/50 R18 test, where both the Weather Control A005 EVO and the Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 98% of Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO has A wet grip rating, whereas 96% of GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 has B rating. We also know where Weather Control A005 EVO is made - Hungary/Italy.
# | Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO | GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R15 - R21 | R16 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO Exemplary2. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 Very good
2. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO Conditionally recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2+ | 2 | ||||
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 1- | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1- | ||||
Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO Rating: Satisfactory | 2+ | 2- | 2+ | ||||
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 Rating: Good | 2+ | 2- | 2 | ||||
Show test details |
Name | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO Rating: Good + | |||||||
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 Rating: Very good | |||||||
Show test details |