Segment
2. Apollo Alnac 4G Lowcost
Comparison: Bridgestone Weather Control A005 vs. Apollo Alnac 4G
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo). Generally, Bridgestone allround tyres are slightly better rated (67%) than Apollo (1%). In this particular case, the Apollo Alnac 4G has a better rating of 56% compared to 45% of the Bridgestone Weather Control A005. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Weather Control A005 was done in 2018, compared to 2015 when was the Apollo Alnac 4G first tested.
| # | Bridgestone Weather Control A005 | Apollo Alnac 4G | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Apollo Alnac 4G 18.88
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Apollo Alnac 4G Exemplary2. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 Recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 Recommended2. Apollo Alnac 4G Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow handling
Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow cornering
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
2. Apollo Alnac 4G ? dB