Segment
2. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, Bridgestone allround tyres are slightly better rated (67%) than Vredestein (62%). In this particular case, the Vredestein Quatrac Pro has a better rating of 61% compared to 45% of the Bridgestone Weather Control A005. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Weather Control A005 was done in 2018, compared to 2019 when was the Vredestein Quatrac Pro first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2020 235/55 R17 test, where both the Weather Control A005 and the Quatrac Pro were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Bridgestone Weather Control A005 | Vredestein Quatrac Pro | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R17 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Premium
1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Exemplary2. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 Recommended
1. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 Recommended2. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Satisfactory
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2,0 | 2,6 | 3,0 | 2,4 | 2,7 | 0,6 | 1,5 |
Bridgestone Weather Control A005 Rating: Poor | 2,0 | 2,6 | 5,4 | 2,4 | 2,9 | 2,0 | 1,9 |
Vredestein Quatrac Pro Rating: Poor | 2,6 | 3,9 | 5,2 | 2,7 | 2,7 | 1,0 | 2,5 |
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | |||
Bridgestone Weather Control A005 Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2+ | 3+ | 3 | |||
Vredestein Quatrac Pro Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 1- | 2- | |||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 39,5 | 46,3 | |||||
Bridgestone Weather Control A005 | 39,7 | 46,3 | |||||
Vredestein Quatrac Pro | 42,9 | 46,5 | |||||
Show test details |