Segment
2. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium
Comparison: Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 vs. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
Table of contents:
| # | Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 | Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R17 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
In this text comparison, we will take an in-depth look at two popular summer tyres: the Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 and the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125. We will analyze several tests conducted by different organisations and provide you with a verdict on the strengths and weaknesses of each tyre. Our aim is to help you make an informed decision while choosing the best tyre for your vehicle.
Starting with the Continental ContiPremiumContact 5, it is manufactured in the Czech Republic and has an overall rating of 90%. This tyre has been replaced by the newer Continental PremiumContact 6. The tyre has performed well in various tests, with some highlights being:
- 3rd place in the ADAC test among 16 tyres, with strengths in interior noise, wet braking, wet circle cornering and wet handling
- 2nd place in the Autozeitung test among 10 tyres
- 1st place in the ACE test among 11 tyres, excelling in aquaplaning (longitudinal), dry braking, dry driving behavior, wet braking, wet circle cornering and wet handling
- 9th place in the Autobild test among 50 tyres
On the other hand, the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 is manufactured in Hungary and is the first equipment for the Citroën C3 Aircross. The tyre has a rating of 88% and has been replaced by the newer Hankook Ventus Prime 4. It also performed well in the tests, with some highlights including:
- 2nd place in the Autobild test among 50 tyres, excelling in dry handling
- 14th place in the ADAC test among 16 tyres
- 4th place in the ACE test among 11 tyres, with strengths in aquaplaning (cross), dry driving behavior and exterior noise
- 6th place in the Autozeitung test among 10 tyres
The Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 has strong performance in wet conditions, including wet braking, wet circle cornering, and wet handling. This tyre also provides excellent dry braking and interior noise reduction for a more comfortable ride.
The Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 showcases its advantage in dry handling and exterior noise reduction. It also performs well in aquaplaning resistance, particularly in cross-aquaplaning scenarios.
In summary, if you primarily seek exceptional wet performance, the Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 would be a better choice. However, if you prioritize dry handling and noise reduction, the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 may be the better option. Overall, both tyres perform well in tests, and you can't go wrong with either choice. For more information, please take a look at the manufacturers' respective websites: Continental and Hankook.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Exemplary2. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
2. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2+ | 2- | ||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 1- | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,5 | 34,3 | |||||
| Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 | 36,4 | 36 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 | 34,5 | 35,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,6 | 3,0 | 1,0 | 1,7 | ||
| Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Rating: Good | 2,2 | 2,2 | 3,3 | 2,5 | 1,7 | ||
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Good | 2,5 | 1,6 | 3,4 | 2,5 | 2,1 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 153 | 42 | 37 | 14 | 6 | ||
| Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Rating: Highly recommended | 153 | 68 | 50 | 16 | 6 | ||
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Recommended | 144 | 57 | 47 | 16 | 9 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 256 | 131 | 133 | ||||
| Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 | 249 | 131 | 118 | ||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 | 225 | 104 | 121 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,5 | 0,5 | 1,5 | 1,6 | ||
| Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Rating: Good | 1,9 | 1,8 | 2,4 | 2,5 | 2,4 | ||
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Good | 3,3 | 1,8 | 2,5 | 3,0 | 2,2 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Rating: Exemplary | 2- | 1- | 2 | ||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 1- | 1- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,6 | 27 | |||||
| Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 | 34,7 | 30,6 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 | 34,6 | 27,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||