Segment
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium2. Nokian zLine SUV Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than Nokian (58%). In this particular case, the Continental PremiumContact 6 has a better rating of 87% compared to 32% of the Nokian zLine SUV. The first tyre test of Continental PremiumContact 6 was done in 2017, compared to 2016 when was the Nokian zLine SUV first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/50 R17 test, where both the PremiumContact 6 and the zLine SUV were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 89% of Continental PremiumContact 6 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Nokian zLine SUV also have A wet ratings. We also know where PremiumContact 6 is made - Slovakia/Germany/Czech Republic.
# | Continental PremiumContact 6 | Nokian zLine SUV | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R15 - R22 | R17 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium2. Nokian zLine SUV Upper-middle
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary2. Nokian zLine SUV Satisfactory
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended2. Nokian zLine SUV Satisfactory
2. Nokian zLine SUV ? dB
Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1- | 1- | 1 | ||||
Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 1- | 1 | ||||
Nokian zLine SUV Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 3+ | ||||
Show test details |