Segment
2. Nokian WR C3 Upper-middle
Comparison: Continental VanContact 4Season vs. Nokian WR C3
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Continental allround tyres are slightly better rated (76%) than Nokian (52%). In this particular case, the Continental VanContact 4Season has a better rating of 90% compared to 27% of the Nokian WR C3. The first tyre test of Continental VanContact 4Season was done in 2020, compared to 2018 when was the Nokian WR C3 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 97% of Continental VanContact 4Season has A wet grip rating, whereas 91% of Nokian WR C3 has E rating.
| # | Continental VanContact 4Season | Nokian WR C3 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental VanContact 4Season Exemplary2. Nokian WR C3 Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Continental VanContact 4Season Recommended2. Nokian WR C3 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
2. Nokian WR C3 33%
Wet handling
2. Nokian WR C3 33%
Wet braking
2. Nokian WR C3 25%
Wet circle cornering
2. Nokian WR C3 33%
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
1. Nokian WR C3 100%
Snow handling
1. Nokian WR C3 100%
Snow cornering
1. Nokian WR C3 100%
Snow traction
1. Nokian WR C3 100%
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
2. Nokian WR C3 62%
Dry handling
2. Nokian WR C3 53%
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
2. Nokian WR C3 81%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Nokian WR C3 72 dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
2. Nokian WR C3 43%