Segment
1. Cooper Zeon CS8 Upper-middle2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Cooper Zeon CS8 vs. Sava Intensa UHP 2
Table of contents:
| # | Cooper Zeon CS8 | Sava Intensa UHP 2 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R19 | R17 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
In this comparative analysis, we put two summer tyre models - the Cooper Zeon CS8 and Sava Intensa UHP 2 under the microscope. Both tyres have been tested in various environments to check handling characteristics, safety aspects, and overall performance.
Cooper Zeon CS8
Manufactured in the UK, the Cooper Zeon CS8 is a summer tyre model that didn’t have a predecessor and has not been replaced with a newer tyre model. It received an overall rating of 53% according to our tests. In the Autobild test, it ranked 19th out of 52 tyres. While its exact strengths haven't been explicitly highlighted, it's fair to presume that it didn't shine in any particular area considering its overall rating and test position.
Sava Intensa UHP 2
The Sava Intensa UHP 2, on the other hand, had a predecessor – the Sava Intensa UHP. Despite not having disclosed where it's manufactured, the UHP 2 notably outshined the Cooper Zeon CS8 with an overall rating of 78%. In the mutual Autobild test, it managed to clinch the 11th position, noticeably better than the Zeon CS8.
A key strength of the Sava Intensa UHP 2 is its superior performance in terms of Aquaplaning - cross and the price/value ratio. AutoBild 2019 summarizes its advantages as "very good safety reserves in aquaplaning, stable driving behavior on a dry track, short wet and dry braking distances, good comfort, and favorable price". The downside is a somewhat limited running performance.
In conclusion, when comparing the Cooper Zeon CS8 and the Sava Intensa UHP 2, the latter performs better overall - as evidenced by the higher rating and better test positions. For more detailed information on both models, you can click the provided links to check the manufacturers' pages: Cooper Zeon CS8 manufacturer and Sava Intensa UHP 2 manufacturer.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Sava Intensa UHP 2 11.312. Cooper Zeon CS8 19.71
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Cooper Zeon CS8 Satisfactory2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Still recommended2. Cooper Zeon CS8 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Offroad
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Sava Intensa UHP 2 72 dB2. Cooper Zeon CS8 ? dB
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
| Cooper Zeon CS8 | 65.4 | 27.7 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 61.7 | 27.4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Cooper Zeon CS8 | 39,1 | 31,3 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 36,3 | 29,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| Cooper Zeon CS8 | 37,3 | 34,3 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 35,7 | 32,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Cooper Zeon CS8 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | 2- | ||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 34,6 | |||||
| Cooper Zeon CS8 | 37 | 39,2 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 35,3 | 38,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||