Segment
1. Firestone Multiseason 2 Upper-middle2. Debica Navigator 3 Lowcost
Comparison: Debica Navigator 3 vs. Firestone Multiseason 2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Generally, Firestone allround tyres are slightly better rated (51%) than Debica (1%). The first tyre test of Debica Navigator 3 was done in 2022, compared to 2020 when was the Firestone Multiseason 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autoklub ČR 2022 205/55 R16 test, where both the Navigator 3 and the Multiseason 2 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 81% of Debica Navigator 3 has C wet grip rating, whereas 94% of Firestone Multiseason 2 has B rating.
| # | Debica Navigator 3 | Firestone Multiseason 2 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R18 | R13 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Comfort
Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 102.7 | 104,8 | 104,5 | 102,7 | |||
| Debica Navigator 3 | 98,2 | 96 | 96,8 | 102,7 | |||
| Firestone Multiseason 2 | 99,5 | 100,1 | 99,6 | 99,9 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||