Segment
1. Debica Presto HP2 Lowcost2. Maxxis Premitra HP5 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Maxxis). Generally, Maxxis summer tyres are slightly better rated (69%) than Debica (61%). In this particular case, the Maxxis Premitra HP5 has a better rating of 85% compared to 84% of the Debica Presto HP2. The first tyre test of Debica Presto HP2 was done in 2021, compared to 2017 when was the Maxxis Premitra HP5 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 205/55 R16 test, where both the Presto HP2 and the Premitra HP5 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Debica Presto HP2 | Maxxis Premitra HP5 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R15 - R17 | R15 - R18 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Debica Presto HP2 Lowcost2. Maxxis Premitra HP5 Lowcost
2. Debica Presto HP2 10.5
1. Debica Presto HP2 Exemplary2. Maxxis Premitra HP5 Very good
1. Debica Presto HP2 Satisfactory2. Maxxis Premitra HP5 Conditionally recommended
1. Debica Presto HP2 70 dB
Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1 | ||||
Debica Presto HP2 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
Maxxis Premitra HP5 Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2+ | 3 | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
Debica Presto HP2 | 36,3 | 31,9 | |||||
Maxxis Premitra HP5 | 35,0 | 32,2 | |||||
Show test details |