Segment
1. Nokian WetProof Upper-middle2. Debica Presto HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Debica Presto HP2 vs. Nokian WetProof
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (81%) than Debica (61%). In this particular case, the Nokian WetProof has a better rating of 87% compared to 84% of the Debica Presto HP2. The first tyre test of Debica Presto HP2 was done in 2021, compared to 2019 when was the Nokian WetProof first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the Presto HP2 and the WetProof were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 94% of Debica Presto HP2 has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Nokian WetProof has A rating.
| # | Debica Presto HP2 | Nokian WetProof | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R17 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WetProof 5.622. Debica Presto HP2 10.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Debica Presto HP2 Exemplary2. Nokian WetProof Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WetProof Recommended2. Debica Presto HP2 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet side guide
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Price/value
Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Nokian WetProof 68 dB2. Debica Presto HP2 70 dB
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | ||||||
| Debica Presto HP2 Rating: Good | 2,3 | ||||||
| Nokian Wetproof Rating: Good | 2,9 | 2,0 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,1 | 1,5 | 2,4 | 1,0 | 1,2 | ||
| Debica Presto HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,6 | 2,9 | 1,5 | 2,2 | ||
| Nokian Wetproof Rating: Satisfactory | 2,1 | 2,2 | 2,7 | 2,5 | 2,6 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1 | ||||
| Debica Presto HP2 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Nokian WetProof Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Debica Presto HP2 | 36,3 | 31,9 | |||||
| Nokian Wetproof | 35,1 | 31,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||