• 7 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Dunlop Sport BluResponse vs. Nokian WetProof

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Dunlop) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Dunlop is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (81%) than Dunlop (67%). In this particular case, the Nokian WetProof has a better rating of 87% compared to 86% of the Dunlop Sport BluResponse. The first tyre test of Dunlop Sport BluResponse was done in 2015, compared to 2019 when was the Nokian WetProof first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2022 215/60 R16 test, where both the Sport BluResponse and the WetProof were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 73% of Dunlop Sport BluResponse dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Nokian WetProof also have A wet ratings.

# Dunlop Sport BluResponse
/86%
Nokian WetProof
/87%

Add to comparison

DimensionsR14 - R17 R14 - R20
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Name WetDryNoiseWearFuel consumption
Best values in test2,11,52,41,01,2
Dunlop Sport BluResponse
Rating: Good
2,32,12,82,52,1
Nokian Wetproof
Rating: Satisfactory
2,1 2,22,72,52,6
Show test details
Name WetDryRunning costs
Best values in test1-2+1
Dunlop Sport BluResponse
Rating: Satisfactory
2-23+
Nokian WetProof
Rating: Satisfactory
223
Show test details
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test34,129,6
Dunlop Sport BluResponse35,432,2
Nokian Wetproof35,131,7
Show test details
Name Points totalWetDryRolling resistanceNoiseRunning costs
Best values in test1536651191017
Dunlop Sport BluResponse
Rating: Highly recommended
152634918715
Nokian WetProof
Rating: Highly recommended
153 66 4517817
Show test details