Segment
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Upper-middle2. Fulda SportControl 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Falken Azenis FK510 vs. Fulda SportControl 2
Table of contents:
| # | Falken Azenis FK510 | Fulda SportControl 2 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R99 | R17 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
In this article, we will be comparing two popular summer tyres, the Falken Azenis FK510 and the Fulda SportControl 2. Both tyres have been tested extensively and have gained a considerable following among drivers. Let's dive into the details and see how they stack up against each other in various tests.
The Falken Azenis FK510 is a high-performance summer tyre manufactured in Japan and Turkey by Falken. With an overall rating of 90%, the FK510 is a highly praised tyre, especially when it comes to its comfort, exterior noise, and price/value ratio. Moreover, this tyre has excellent rolling resistance, proving to be not only comfortable but also fuel-efficient. Please note that the FK510 has been replaced by a newer model, the Falken Azenis FK520.
On the other hand, the Fulda SportControl 2 is a summer tyre produced by Fulda, with an overall rating of 84%. The SportControl 2 stands out for its aquaplaning resistance, comfort, exterior noise, and rolling resistance. This tyre has not been replaced by a newer model and is still considered a strong contender in the summer tyre market.
In the Autobild test, the Falken Azenis FK510 placed 3rd out of 52 tested tyres. Its strengths included excellent safety reserves in aquaplaning situations, short braking distances on both wet and dry surfaces, and a comfortable ride. However, the FK510 exhibited oversteer handling behavior on wet surfaces and satisfactory grip on the rear axle in dry conditions.
In the same test, the Fulda SportControl 2 ranked 9th. It was praised for its reliable performance on both wet and dry surfaces, good aquaplaning resistance, short braking distances on dry surfaces, low rolling resistance, and overall comfort. However, this tyre exhibited extended braking distances on wet surfaces, limited grip on dry surfaces, and an indirect steering response.
Based on the available test data from Autobild, the Falken Azenis FK510 provides better overall performance compared to the Fulda SportControl 2, with its superior safety reserves in aquaplaning situations and shorter braking distances on both wet and dry surfaces. However, both tyres offer good comfort, low exterior noise, and fuel-efficient rolling resistance.
In conclusion, if safety and braking performance are your top priorities, the Falken Azenis FK510 may be the right choice for you. However, the Fulda SportControl 2 remains a reliable option with its good aquaplaning resistance, short dry braking distances, and overall comfort. It is essential to consider your driving priorities and conditions before making a decision.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Fulda SportControl 2 Exemplary2. Falken Azenis FK510 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Recommended2. Fulda SportControl 2 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Price/value
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Fulda SportControl 2 70 dB
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2+ | |||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2 | 1- | ||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 Rating: Good | 2 | 2+ | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 | 36 | 30,7 | |||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 | 34,2 | 31,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 | 36 | 29 | |||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 | 35,1 | 32 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 34,6 | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 | 35,5 | 34,8 | |||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 | 35,1 | 37,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||