Segment
1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Upper-middle2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle
Comparison: Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4
Table of contents:
| # | Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun | Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R22 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Our comparison between Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun and Kleber Dynaxer HP4, two summer tyres from Falken and Kleber, respectively, aims to help you make the best decision for your vehicle. Both tyres were subjected to various tests, providing information on strengths, weaknesses, performance, and overall ranking.
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun scored an 87% rating in our tyre tests, and it is a touring tyre made in Turkey. On the other hand, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 holds a 78% rating by us. In the ADAC test, ZE310 Ecorun ranked 6 out of 50, while Dynaxer HP4 ranked 12.
In the Autobild test from 2018, ZE310 Ecorun showed balances performance on both wet and dry surfaces (best grade). However, it had weaknesses in environmental performance, efficiency, and sustainability. Meanwhile, Dynaxer HP4 exhibited strengths in environmental performance, wear, and efficiency, but it lacked balance and displayed weaknesses on wet surfaces.
In the GTÜ test, ZE310 Ecorun placed 2nd out of 8 tyres, whereas Dynaxer HP4 secured the top position (1st). It's important to note that both tires performed well in this test, showcasing their strong potential.
For the Autobild test, ZE310 Ecorun ranked 8th out of 53, while Dynaxer HP4 secured the 14th position. The Falken tyre exhibited an exceptional performance in aquaplaning, comfort, and wet braking. On the other hand, Dynaxer HP4 stood out for its comfort and exterior noise aspects.
In the recent Autobild 2022 test, ZE310 Ecorun impressed with its excellent aquaplaning properties, stable wet handling, short braking distances, dynamic dry handling, quiet exterior noise, and affordable price. On the other hand, its higher rolling resistance was highlighted as a drawback. For Dynaxer HP4, the test commended its good aquaplaning properties, short wet and dry braking distances, excellent driving comfort, and low rolling noise. However, it displayed mediocre grip on wet surfaces, a noticeable delay in steering response, and understeer during the test on dry pavement.
Verdict: The Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun has an overall stronger performance, with balanced wet and dry grip, making it a great choice for those who prioritize handling and aquaplaning resistance. However, if you value efficiency, wear, and driving comfort, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 could be a better option. Both tyres have their unique strengths and weaknesses, and considering their test results, it's essential to pick the one that meets your driving preferences and requirements.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Exemplary2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Conditionally recommended2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Still recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet braking
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Dry braking
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Offroad
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Price/value
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Rating: Good | 2,7 | 2,1 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Good | 2,1 | 2,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 61 | 48 | 18 | 8 | |||
| Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Rating: Recommended | 61 | 45 | 14 | 5 | |||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Highly recommended | 61 | 48 | 17 | 8 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1+ | ||||
| Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Rating: Good | 1- | 2+ | 2- | ||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 3+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1 | ||||
| Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun | 35,8 | 31,4 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | 36,2 | 31,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||