Segment
1. Continental EcoContact 6 Premium2. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Firestone (70%). In this particular case, the Firestone Roadhawk has a better rating of 59% compared to 53% of the Continental EcoContact 6. The first tyre test of Firestone Roadhawk was done in 2018, compared to 2020 when was the Continental EcoContact 6 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2022 185/65 R15 test, where both the Roadhawk and the EcoContact 6 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 99% of Firestone Roadhawk dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (60%) of the Continental EcoContact 6 also have A wet ratings.
# | Firestone Roadhawk
| Continental EcoContact 6
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R15 - R21 | R13 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Continental EcoContact 6 Premium2. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle
1. Firestone Roadhawk Exemplary2. Continental EcoContact 6 Satisfactory
1. Continental EcoContact 6 Satisfactory2. Firestone Roadhawk Conditionally recommended
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | dobré | 1,7 | 1,6 | 2,7 | 1 | 1,7 | |
Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,8 | 2,2 | 3,7 | 2,0 | 2,4 | |
Continental EcoContact 6 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,6 | 2,4 | 3,0 | 2,5 | 1,8 | |
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
Firestone Roadhawk | 37,7 | 32,8 | |||||
Continental EcoContact 6 | 36,4 | 32,7 | |||||
Show test details |