Segment
1. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle2. Nokian Line Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (58%) than Firestone (54%). In this particular case, the Firestone Roadhawk has a better rating of 72% compared to 35% of the Nokian Line. The first tyre test of Firestone Roadhawk was done in 2018, compared to 2016 when was the Nokian Line first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 195/65 R15 test, where both the Roadhawk and the Line were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 96% of Firestone Roadhawk dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Nokian Line also have A wet ratings.
# | Firestone Roadhawk | Nokian Line | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R15 - R21 | R14 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle2. Nokian Line Upper-middle
1. Nokian Line 17.
2. Nokian Line 12.17
1. Firestone Roadhawk Exemplary2. Nokian Line Good
1. Nokian Line Good2. Firestone Roadhawk Conditionally recommended
1. Firestone Roadhawk 71 dB2. Nokian Line ? dB
Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2+ | 2- | ||||
Nokian Line Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 3 | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,5 | 34,3 | |||||
Firestone Roadhawk | 35,2 | 36,5 | |||||
Nokian Line | 37,5 | 38 | |||||
Show test details |