• 10 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Firestone Winterhawk 3 vs. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Firestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (50%) than Yokohama (43%). In this particular case, the Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 has a better rating of 52% compared to 40% of the Firestone Winterhawk 3. The first tyre test of Firestone Winterhawk 3 was done in 2015, compared to 2018 when was the Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 245/45 R18 test, where both the Winterhawk 3 and the BluEarth winter V905 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 92% of Firestone Winterhawk 3 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 also have C wet ratings.

# Firestone Winterhawk 3
/40%
Yokohama BluEarth winter V905
/52%

Add to comparison

DimensionsR13 - R18 R15 - R22
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Name Stopping distance on wet
Best values in test30,3
Firestone Winterhawk 337,9
Yokohama BluEarth winter V90535,426,1
Show test details
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test29,224
Firestone Winterhawk 334,325,5
Yokohama BluEarth winter V90532,526
Show test details
Name WetDrySnowRunning costs
Best values in test1-2+11
Firestone Winterhawk 3
Rating: Conditionally recommended
33+2+2+
Yokohama BluEarth winter V905
Rating: Satisfactory
22+ 3+2-
Show test details