Segment
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 Upper-middle2. Fulda EcoControl HP Lowcost
# | Fulda EcoControl HP | Kleber Dynaxer HP3 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R19 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
In the world of summer tyres, Fulda EcoControl HP and Kleber Dynaxer HP3 are commonly considered options. At a glance, it's clear that there are strengths and weaknesses unique to each model that are noteworthy for potential buyers.
Beginning with the Fulda EcoControl HP manufactured by Fulda, its high mileage and price-to-value ratio are undoubtedly standout features, as confirmed by Autobild where it ranked at a commendable 7th position out of 50 tyres tested. This suggests superior longevity and cost-effectiveness, making it an ideal choice for those looking for durability and value.
However, when compared to the Kleber Dynaxer HP3 from Kleber, a comparison slightly tapers this shine. For example, in the Autobild test, while the Fulda EcoControl HP outperforms in mileage and price, the Kleber Dynaxer HP3 outranks it in the wet circle cornering aspect, positioning itself as a more reliable option in wet conditions. The discrepancy intensifies further in the ADAC test, where the HP3 surprisingly outperforms the EcoControl HP by securing 4th position, leaving the latter lagging behind at the 11th spot out of 14 tyres evaluated.
Despite the disparity in test results, it's worth mentioning that the Fulda EcoControl HP has been replaced by the newer model, Fulda EcoControl HP2. The upgraded model aims to improve upon the primary weak points indicated by the test results, which potentially positions it as a stronger competitor in the market.
In conclusion, the Kleber Dynaxer HP3 surpasses the Fulda EcoControl HP in terms of wet condition handling and overall test position. However, the EcoControl HP makes a compelling case if mileage and value-for-money are of primary importance. Ultimately, your choice boils down to your specific needs and priorities.
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 Upper-middle2. Fulda EcoControl HP Lowcost
1. Fulda EcoControl HP Recommended2. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 Satisfactory
1. Fulda EcoControl HP Recommended2. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 Satisfactory
1. Fulda EcoControl HP 69 dB
Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
Fulda EcoControl HP Rating: Good | 2- | 2+ | 1 | ||||
Kleber Dynaxer HP3 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2- | 2+ | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,5 | 34,3 | |||||
Fulda EcoControl HP | 37 | 39,6 | |||||
Kleber Dynaxer HP3 | 39,2 | 37,7 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,5 | 3,0 | 2,0 | 1,6 | ||
Fulda EcoControl HP Rating: Satisfactory | 3,2 | 2,4 | 3,4 | 2,0 | 2,1 | ||
Kleber Dynaxer HP3 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 1,8 | 4,1 | 2,0 | 2,4 | ||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,6 | 27 | |||||
Fulda EcoControl HP | 36,4 | 28,8 | |||||
Kleber Dynaxer HP3 | 37,7 | 31,2 | |||||
Show test details |