• 7 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Fulda EcoControl HP vs. Nokian WetProof

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (81%) than Fulda (62%). In this particular case, the Nokian WetProof has a better rating of 87% compared to 81% of the Fulda EcoControl HP. The first tyre test of Fulda EcoControl HP was done in 2016, compared to 2019 when was the Nokian WetProof first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 71% of Fulda EcoControl HP has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Nokian WetProof has A rating.

# Fulda EcoControl HP
/81%
Nokian WetProof
/87%
DimensionsR14 - R16 R14 - R17
PriceSet your car's tyre size
TypeSummer Summer
SegmentLowcost Upper-middle
Tested6x 12x
Best place6. 205/55 R16 Autobild 20161. 205/55 R16 ACE 2019
Worst place17. 195/65 R15 Autobild 201817. 205/55 R16 Autobild 2021
Average place9.83 5.67
Last test2018 2022
Best ratingRecommended 205/55 R16 Autobild 2016Highly recommended 205/55 R16 ACE 2019
Worst ratingRecommended 205/55 R16 Autobild 2016Recommended 215/55 R17 AutoMotorSport 2019
Wet90.3 %83.3 %
Aquaplaning - cross81% 72.1%
Aquaplaning - longitudal92% 78.8%
Wet circle cornering92% 91.8%
Wet handling91% 84.4%
Costs83.7 %57.1 %
Rolling resistance51% 60.4%
Mileage100% 50.5%
Price/value100% 45.5%
Dry96 %78.2 %
Dry handling96% 81%
Comfort82 %71.6 %
Exterior noise82% 85.4%