Segment
1. Vredestein Sportrac 5 Premium2. Fulda EcoControl HP Lowcost
Comparison: Fulda EcoControl HP vs. Vredestein Sportrac 5
Table of contents:
| # | Fulda EcoControl HP | Vredestein Sportrac 5 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Today's review focuses on a comparison between two summer tyres - the Fulda EcoControl HP and the Vredestein Sportrac 5. Both models have been subject to rigorous tests to assess their performance, durability, and overall value for money.
Starting with Fulda, their EcoControl HP tyre received a rating of 51% from our assessment. Among its strengths, the most noted were its excellent mileage and competitive price-value ratio as seen in the Auto Bild test where it obtained the 7th place out of 50 tyres. Thus, if you're looking for a cost-efficient option that doesn't compromise on quality, the EcoControl HP should definitely be a consideration. Please note that this model was replaced by the Fulda EcoControl HP2, which also promises similar or better features and performance.
On the other hand, we have the Sportrac 5 from Vredestein. With an overall rating of 58%, this tyre has shown significant performance despite stiff competition. Although it landed at the 11th position in the Auto Bild test, the Sportrac 5 still merits praise for its durable construction and functionality. The only downside was its performance in the ADAC test where it came last out of 16 winter tyres, signalling potential issues in handling extreme winter conditions.
When it boils down to the comparison between these two offerings, each has its own merits. The EcoControl HP impresses with its mileage and price-value ratio, making it an incredibly cost-effective option. However, it was replaced by the newer model, the EcoControl HP2, which might appeal to those looking for the latest technology. Meanwhile, the Sportrac 5 delivers consistent performance across multiple tests, proving itself a reliable and efficient tyre.
Overall, it can be said that the EcoControl HP might suit those seeking value for money, while the Sportrac 5 could cater to demands for stable performance and durability. It's important to assess individual driving conditions and requirements before making a decision. Check out more about these models on our website for a comprehensive guide to find the perfect tyre for your needs.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Fulda EcoControl HP Recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Fulda EcoControl HP Recommended2. Vredestein Sportrac 5 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Fulda EcoControl HP 69 dB
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Fulda EcoControl HP Rating: Good | 2- | 2+ | 1 | ||||
| Vredestein Sportrac 5 Rating: Good | 2 | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,5 | 34,3 | |||||
| Fulda EcoControl HP | 37 | 39,6 | |||||
| Vredestein Sportrac 5 | 36,8 | 37 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,6 | 3,0 | 1,0 | 1,7 | ||
| Fulda EcoControl HP Rating: Satisfactory | 2,9 | 2,6 | 3,4 | 1,5 | 2,2 | ||
| Vredestein Sportrac 5 Rating: Sufficient | 2,7 | 1,7 | 3,1 | 1,5 | 1,7 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Fulda EcoControl HP Rating: Recommended | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Vredestein Sportrac 5 Rating: Recommended | 2- | 2- | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,6 | 27 | |||||
| Fulda EcoControl HP | 36,4 | 28,8 | |||||
| Vredestein Sportrac 5 | 37,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||