Segment
1. Vredestein Sportrac 5 Premium2. Fulda EcoControl HP Lowcost
Comparison: Fulda EcoControl HP vs. Vredestein Sportrac 5
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, Vredestein summer tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Fulda (62%). In this particular case, the Fulda EcoControl HP has a better rating of 81% compared to 80% of the Vredestein Sportrac 5. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 195/65 R15 test, where both the EcoControl HP and the Sportrac 5 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Fulda EcoControl HP | Vredestein Sportrac 5 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Fulda EcoControl HP Recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Fulda EcoControl HP Recommended2. Vredestein Sportrac 5 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Fulda EcoControl HP 69 dB
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Fulda EcoControl HP Rating: Good | 2- | 2+ | 1 | ||||
| Vredestein Sportrac 5 Rating: Good | 2 | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,5 | 34,3 | |||||
| Fulda EcoControl HP | 37 | 39,6 | |||||
| Vredestein Sportrac 5 | 36,8 | 37 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,6 | 3,0 | 1,0 | 1,7 | ||
| Fulda EcoControl HP Rating: Satisfactory | 2,9 | 2,6 | 3,4 | 1,5 | 2,2 | ||
| Vredestein Sportrac 5 Rating: Sufficient | 2,7 | 1,7 | 3,1 | 1,5 | 1,7 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Fulda EcoControl HP Rating: Recommended | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Vredestein Sportrac 5 Rating: Recommended | 2- | 2- | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,6 | 27 | |||||
| Fulda EcoControl HP | 36,4 | 28,8 | |||||
| Vredestein Sportrac 5 | 37,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||