Segment
2. Kleber Dynaxer UHP Upper-middle
# | GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | Kleber Dynaxer UHP | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R17 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
In this comparison, we are going to delve into the specifics of two summer tyres: the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 by Goodyear and Kleber Dynaxer UHP from Kleber.
Starting off with the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5, it is a successor to the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3, holding a solid 90% rating on our website. Notably, it’s made in Germany and Slovenia, confirming the high-quality manufacturing standards.
The GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 has showed outstanding performance in the "Autobild" test, securing the first position out of 53 tyres. It demonstrated considerable strengths in areas like price/value, wet handling, aquaplaning - cross and mileage.
If you are interested in the latest model, make sure to check Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, the successor of this reliable and top-performing tyre.
Moving on to the Kleber Dynaxer UHP, it has a lower rating on our website, with a 68% score. Notably, it doesn’t have a preceding or succeeding model, unlike the GoodYear tyre. The manufacturing location for this tyre hasn’t been specified.
In the same "Autobild" test, the Kleber Dynaxer UHP performed moderately, securing the 15th place out of 53 tyres. While it’s not a leader, it delivered a decent performance in the competition.
Verdict:
Looking at the summarized data from all tests, it is clear that the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 outperforms the Kleber Dynaxer UHP in crucial areas such as handling, aquaplaning, and mileage.
However, Kleber Dynaxer UHP could be an excellent pick for those looking for a budget-friendly option that doesn't compromise on performance, even though it ranks lower in the tests. If we had to pick a winner based on the testing data it would definitely be the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5.
2. Kleber Dynaxer UHP Upper-middle
1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Exemplary2. Kleber Dynaxer UHP Satisfactory
2. Kleber Dynaxer UHP Satisfactory
Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1 | 1- | 1 | ||||
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2+ | 1 | ||||
Kleber Dynaxer UHP Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2 | 2 | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | 33,2 | 30,8 | |||||
Kleber Dynaxer UHP | 34,1 | 32,2 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2+ | 1 | ||||
Kleber Dynaxer UHP Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2 | 2 | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | 34,7 | 28,8 | |||||
Kleber Dynaxer UHP | 35,9 | 32,1 | |||||
Show test details |