• 10 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 vs. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti

# GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
/85%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
/55%

Add to comparison

DimensionsR17 - R22 R17 - R24
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

The following text compares the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 and the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti summer tyres. Both tyres have been extensively tested and reviewed, with results from Autobild, ADAC, and Gute-Fahrt available for further analysis.


The GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 is a high-performance tyre with a 94% rating, making it a top choice for many drivers. It has since been replaced by the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6. This tyre excels in various areas such as price/value, wet handling, aquaplaning resistance, and mileage. It is manufactured in Slovenia and Germany by Goodyear, a well-known tyre company.


The Vredestein Ultrac Vorti, on the other hand, is another summer tyre option with a slightly lower rating of 87%. Manufactured in the Netherlands by Vredestein, this tyre shines in areas like wet braking, wet handling, and exterior noise. The tyre has not yet been replaced by a newer model.


In the Autobild test, the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 outperformed the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti, ranking 1st out of 53 tyres. The Vredestein Ultrac Vorti placed 9th, making it a credible alternative. The Asymmetric 5 demonstrated its strengths in price/value, wet handling, aquaplaning resistance, and mileage. The Vredestein Ultrac Vorti showcased its abilities in aquaplaning resistance, wet braking, wet handling, wet side guide, and dry handling.


When compared in the ADAC test, the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 maintained its superiority by ranking 3rd out of 16 tyres, with its best feature being mileage. In contrast, the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti placed 7th in the test with strengths in mileage and exterior noise.


The Gute-Fahrt test saw the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 securing the 2nd position out of 10 tyres, while the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti came in last at the 10th position, with wet braking as its standout feature.


In summary, the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 is the clear winner in terms of overall performance and test results. Its strengths are found in price/value, wet handling, aquaplaning resistance, and mileage. Meanwhile, the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti is a decent alternative, especially for those valuing wet performance and reduced exterior noise. However, it falls short in comparison to the Asymmetric 5 in terms of overall test rankings and performance.

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Name WetDryRunning costs
Best values in test11-1
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Rating: Exemplary
1- 2+1
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
Rating: Exemplary
2+1- 2
Show test details
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test32,128,7
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 533,230,8
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti33,431,3
Show test details
Name WetDryNoiseWearFuel consumption
Best values in test1,71,32,82,01,6
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Rating: Good
2,31,73,12,0 1,9
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
Rating: Satisfactory
2,72,52,92,0 2,4
Show test details
Name
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Rating: Very good -
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
Rating: Good
Show test details
Name WetDryRunning costs
Best values in test111
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Rating: Exemplary
1- 2+1
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
Rating: Good
22+2-
Show test details
Name WetDry
Best values in test1-1-
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Rating: Exemplary
1- 2+
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
Rating: Exemplary
22+
Show test details
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test34,228,7
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 534,728,8
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti35,330,8
Show test details