8 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Nokian WetProof

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Goodyear) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Goodyear summer tyres are slightly better rated (86%) than Nokian (81%). In this particular case, the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance has a better rating of 88% compared to 87% of the Nokian WetProof. The first tyre test of Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance was done in 2016, compared to 2019 when was the Nokian WetProof first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ACE 2019 205/55 R16 test, where both the Efficient Grip Performance and the WetProof were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 50% of Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Nokian WetProof also have A wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Efficient Grip Performance is made in Slovenia and WetProof is made in Finland.

#	Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance /88%	Nokian WetProof /87%

Dimensions	R14 - R20	R14 - R20
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance Premium

2. Nokian WetProof Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 153

2. Nokian WetProof 47

Number of tests

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 15x

2. Nokian WetProof 12x

Best position in test

1. Nokian WetProof 1.

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 3.

Worst position in test

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 12.

2. Nokian WetProof 17.

Average position in tests

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 5.33

2. Nokian WetProof 5.67

Year of the last test

1. Nokian WetProof 2022

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2019

Best rating in test

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance Exemplary

2. Nokian WetProof Highly recommended

Worst rating in test

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance Good

2. Nokian WetProof Recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Nokian
WetProof
83.3%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
80.6%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 92%

2. Nokian WetProof 72%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 87%

2. Nokian WetProof 79%

Wet handling

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 85%

2. Nokian WetProof 84%

Wet braking

1. Nokian WetProof 84%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 77%

Wet circle cornering

1. Nokian WetProof 92%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 78%

Wet side guide

1. Nokian WetProof 89%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 67%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Nokian WetProof ?

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
82.2%

Nokian
WetProof
78.2%

Dry handling

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 91%

2. Nokian WetProof 81%

Dry braking

1. Nokian WetProof 86%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 81%

Dry driving behavior

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 83%

2. Nokian WetProof 71%

Dry lane changing

1. Nokian WetProof 81%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 78%

Dry steering response

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 67%

2. Nokian WetProof 63%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Nokian
WetProof
76.9%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
71.5%

Exterior noise

1. Nokian WetProof 85%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 71%

Interior noise

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 73%

2. Nokian WetProof 69%

Comfort

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 75%

2. Nokian WetProof 53%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 68 dB

2. Nokian WetProof 68 dB

Costs

(Overall rating)

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
66.3%

Nokian
WetProof
58.6%

Rolling resistance

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 90%

2. Nokian WetProof 60%

Mileage

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 64%

2. Nokian WetProof 51%

Fuel efficiency

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 88%

2. Nokian WetProof 78%

Price/value

1. Nokian WetProof 46%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 23%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Nokian WetProof ?

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance ?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

ACE Summer tyre test 2019 205/55 R16

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Rolling resistance	Noise	Running costs
Best values in test	153	66	51	19	10	17
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance Rating: Recommended	143	56	45	19	8	15
Nokian WetProof Rating: Highly recommended	153	66	45	17	8	17
Show test details

AutoMotorSport Summer tyre test 2019 215/55 R17

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Enviromental impact
Best values in test	8,8	9,1	9,3	9,7
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance Rating: Recommended	8,3	8,8	7,7	8,7
Nokian WetProof Rating: Recommended	8,8	9,0	9,0	6,5
Show test details

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Nokian WetProof

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands