Segment
2. Kumho Ecsta HS51 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, GoodYear allround tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Kumho (52%). In this particular case, the GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 has a better rating of 92% compared to 45% of the Kumho Ecsta HS51. The first tyre test of GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 was done in 2020, compared to 2016 when was the Kumho Ecsta HS51 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 94% of GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (71%) of the Kumho Ecsta HS51 also have B wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 is made in Slovenia/France and Ecsta HS51 is made in China.
# | GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 | Kumho Ecsta HS51 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R14 - R18 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Kumho Ecsta HS51 Upper-middle
1. Kumho Ecsta HS51 Exemplary2. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 Test winner
1. Kumho Ecsta HS51 Satisfactory2. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 Satisfactory
2. Kumho Ecsta HS51 ? dB