• 7 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (86%) than Hankook (84%). In this particular case, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 has a better rating of 90% compared to 87% of the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750. The first tyre test of Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 was done in 2018, compared to 2021 when was the Michelin CrossClimate 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 195/55 R16 test, where both the Kinergy 4S2 H750 and the CrossClimate 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 95% of Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Michelin CrossClimate 2 also have B wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Kinergy 4S2 H750 is made in Korea and CrossClimate 2 is made in Italy.

# Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
/87%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
/90%

Add to comparison

DimensionsR14 - R19 R15 - R20
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test39,944,4
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H75042,148
Michelin CrossClimate 239,9 49,2
Show test details
Name WetDrySnowRunning costs
Best values in test1-2+1-1
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
Rating: Good
22+ 1- 3+
Michelin CrossClimate 2
Rating: Satisfactory
2-2+ 1- 3
Show test details
Name WetDrySnowRolling resistanceWear
Best values in test2+2+2+11
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
Rating: Good
22223
Michelin CrossClimate 2
Rating: Satisfactory
2-1-2+ 1 2-
Show test details
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test37,650
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H75040,352,3
Michelin CrossClimate 237,6 53,9
Show test details