Segment
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium2. Vredestein Sportrac 5 Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (59%) than Vredestein (56%). In this particular case, the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 has a better rating of 72% compared to 58% of the Vredestein Sportrac 5. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 195/65 R15 test, where both the Ventus Prime3 K125 and the Sportrac 5 were tested. See more mutual tests below. We also know where Ventus Prime3 K125 is made - Hungary.
# | Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 | Vredestein Sportrac 5 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R14 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium2. Vredestein Sportrac 5 Premium
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Exemplary
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Conditionally recommended2. Vredestein Sportrac 5 Sufficient
Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 1- | 2- | ||||
Vredestein Sportrac 5 Rating: Good | 2 | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,5 | 34,3 | |||||
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 | 34,5 | 35,2 | |||||
Vredestein Sportrac 5 | 36,8 | 37 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,6 | 3,0 | 1,0 | 1,7 | ||
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Good | 2,5 | 1,6 | 3,4 | 2,5 | 2,1 | ||
Vredestein Sportrac 5 Rating: Sufficient | 2,7 | 1,7 | 3,1 | 1,5 | 1,7 | ||
Show test details |
Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 153 | 42 | 37 | 14 | 6 | ||
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Recommended | 144 | 57 | 47 | 16 | 9 | ||
Vredestein Sportrac 5 Rating: Recommended | 137 | 54 | 47 | 16 | 6 | ||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,5 | 0,5 | 1,5 | 1,6 | ||
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Good | 3,3 | 1,8 | 2,5 | 3,0 | 2,2 | ||
Vredestein Sportrac 5 Rating: Good | 2,8 | 2,6 | 1,0 | 3,2 | 2,0 | ||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 1- | 1- | ||||
Vredestein Sportrac 5 Rating: Recommended | 2- | 2- | 2 | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,6 | 27 | |||||
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 | 34,6 | 27,9 | |||||
Vredestein Sportrac 5 | 37,1 | 29,6 | |||||
Show test details |