Segment
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Premium2. Kleber Dynaxer UHP Upper-middle
Comparison: Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 vs. Kleber Dynaxer UHP
Table of contents:
| # | Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 | Kleber Dynaxer UHP | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R17 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
The Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 and the Kleber Dynaxer UHP are two high-performing summer tyres that have demonstrated different sets of strengths and weaknesses according to recent tyre tests.
Made in Korea, the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 is an Ultra-Ultra High Performance (UUHP) summer tyre that has achieved an 82% rating on our site. This tyre also recorded strong performances in third-party tests, securing a prestigious 3rd position out of 53 tyres tested in Autobild's evaluation. Noteworthy qualities of the Ventus S1 evo3 include exceptional dry and wet braking, agile handling, and commendable driving performances ("Überzeugende Fahrleistungen, agiles Handling, kurze Nass- und Trocken- bremswege"). However, it's under average kilometer mileage led to a rating reduction.
On the other hand, the Kleber Dynaxer UHP scored a respectable rating of 73% on our site. In Autobild's test, it achieved a 15th position finish. The Dynaxer UHP's prime features are its reduced exterior noise level and good kilometer coverage ("Gute Kilometer- leistung, leises Abrollgeräusch"), making it an excellent choice for those seeking a quiet and efficient drive. Nonetheless, its grip, side guidance in wet situations, and aquaplaning reserves could be improved.
Although both tyres have their strengths and weaknesses, it is clear that the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 outperforms the Kleber Dynaxer UHP in multiple areas, making it the overall better choice according to test results. That being said, if exterior noise and kilometer coverage are major factors for you, the Kleber Dynaxer UHP is definitely worth considering.
In conclusion, it all comes down to individual preference and driving needs. Both the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 and Kleber Dynaxer UHP shine in their own areas and offer unique benefits to drivers. We recommend drivers consider these test results, alongside their specific driving habits and requirements, before making a purchase.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Exemplary2. Kleber Dynaxer UHP Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kleber Dynaxer UHP Satisfactory2. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Dry braking
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Price/value
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Rating: Satisfactory | 2+ | 2+ | 3+ | ||||
| Kleber Dynaxer UHP Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2- | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer UHP | 64.5 | 28 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Rating: Satisfactory | 2+ | 2+ | 3+ | ||||
| Kleber Dynaxer UHP Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 | 34,7 | 30,3 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer UHP | 34,1 | 32,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 1- | 2 | ||||
| Kleber Dynaxer UHP Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 | 35,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer UHP | 35,9 | 32,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||