• 10 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 vs. Michelin Alpin A4

Table of contents:

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (80%) than Hankook (71%). In this particular case, the Michelin Alpin A4 has a better rating of 70% compared to 68% of the Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452. The first tyre test of Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Michelin Alpin A4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 185/65 R15 test, where both the Winter i*cept RS2 W452 and the Alpin A4 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 90% of Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (95%) of the Michelin Alpin A4 also have C wet ratings. We also know where Winter i*cept RS2 W452 is made - Korea.

# Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
/68%
 		Michelin Alpin A4
/70%

Add to comparison

New comparison
DimensionsR13 - R17 R14 - R17
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

ADAC Winter tyre test 2019 185/65 R15
Name WetDrySnowIceNoiseWearFuel consumption
Best values in test1,82,11,92,22,61,51,6
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
Rating: Recommended		2,12,52,52,62,92,02,6
Michelin Alpin A4
Rating: Recommended		2,12,22,82,33,01,5 2,7
Show test details
ADAC Winter tyre test 2016 185/65 R15
Name WetDrySnowIceNoiseWearFuel consumption
Best values in test1,81,91,72,22,811,5
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
Rating: -		2,81,9 2,62,84,02,52,3
Michelin Alpin A4
Rating: -		2,42,02,42,43,51 2,5
Show test details