• 7 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 vs. Nokian WR D4

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (82%) than Nokian (76%). In this particular case, the Nokian WR D4 has a better rating of 86% compared to 85% of the Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452. The first tyre test of Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Nokian WR D4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 185/65 R15 test, where both the Winter i*cept RS2 W452 and the WR D4 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 90% of Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 has C wet grip rating, whereas 97% of Nokian WR D4 has B rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Winter i*cept RS2 W452 is made in Korea and WR D4 is made in Finland.

# Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
/85%
Nokian WR D4
/86%

Add to comparison

DimensionsR13 - R17 R13 - R20
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Name WetDrySnowIceNoiseWearFuel consumption
Best values in test1,82,11,92,22,61,51,6
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
Rating: Recommended
2,12,52,52,62,92,02,6
Nokian WR D4
Rating: Recommended
2,93,12,02,32,93,01,7
Show test details
Name Points total
Best values in test9,1
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
Rating: Recommended
8,0
Nokian WR D4
Rating: Recommended
8,1
Show test details
Name WetDrySnowRunning costs
Best values in test1-2+11
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
Rating: Good
2 21- 1-
Nokian WR D4
Rating: Satisfactory
3 2-1 2
Show test details
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test34,327
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W45234,927,7
Nokian WR D437,327,6
Show test details
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test32,225,9
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W45235,928,6
Nokian WR D43527,7
Show test details
Name Points total
Best values in test100
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W45299,8
Nokian WR D498
Show test details
Name WetDrySnowIceNoiseWearFuel consumption
Best values in test2,12,01,92,33,10,51,4
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
Rating: Satisfactory
3,32,0 2,12,53,61,52,1
Nokian WR D4
Rating: Satisfactory
2,62,51,9 2,53,42,52,0
Show test details
Name WetDrySnowIceNoiseWearFuel consumption
Best values in test1,81,71,72,13,01,51,7
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
Rating: Satisfactory
2,62,22,72,53,72,52,2
Nokian WR D4
Rating: Satisfactory
3,12,31,7 2,43,63,01,9
Show test details
Name Points totalWetDrySnowRolling resistanceNoise
Best values in test10096,999,899100100
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W45297,692,199,695,986,199,1
Nokian WR D499,796,9 99,599 85,197,9
Show test details
Name Points totalWetDrySnow
Best values in test101100103,3100,3
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
Rating: Satisfactory
96,290,399,498,9
Nokian WR D4
Rating: Good
99,397,4100,599,9
Show test details
Name WetDrySnowRunning costs
Best values in test1-22+1
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
Rating: -
2-2 22
Nokian WR D4
Rating: -
22- 2+ 2-
Show test details
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test34,225
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W45239,126,2
Nokian WR D437,326,0
Show test details
Name Points totalWetDrySnowRolling resistanceNoise
Best values in test4121421271432510
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
Rating: Highly recommended
3631041181411610
Nokian WR D4
Rating: Highly recommended
387124121142218
Show test details
Name WetDrySnowIceNoiseWearFuel consumption
Best values in test1,81,91,72,22,811,5
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
Rating: -
2,81,9 2,62,84,02,52,3
Nokian WR D4
Rating: -
2,72,42,42,53,82,52,0
Show test details