Segment
2. Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than Yokohama (43%). In this particular case, the Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906 has a better rating of 72% compared to 68% of the Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452. The first tyre test of Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 was done in 2016, compared to 2021 when was the Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 205/55 R16 test, where both the Winter i*cept RS2 W452 and the BluEarth-Winter V906 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 90% of Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 has C wet grip rating, whereas 83% of Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906 has B rating. We also know where Winter i*cept RS2 W452 is made - Korea.
# | Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 | Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R13 - R17 | R15 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906 Upper-middle
1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Highly recommended2. Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906 Satisfactory
1. Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906 Satisfactory2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Satisfactory
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Wear | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 1- | 1 | ||
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Rating: Good | 1- | 2 | 1- | 2 | 2+ | ||
Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 2- | 3+ | 3 | ||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,1 | 27,3 | |||||
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 | 33,4 | 28,2 | |||||
Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906 | 35,9 | 29,2 | |||||
Show test details |