Segment
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle2. Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Kleber) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Kleber is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Kumho summer tyres are slightly better rated (66%) than Kleber (54%). In this particular case, the Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 has a better rating of 79% compared to 78% of the Kleber Dynaxer HP4. The first tyre test of Kleber Dynaxer HP4 was done in 2020, compared to 2016 when was the Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the Dynaxer HP4 and the EcowinG ES01 KH27 were tested.
| # | Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Dry driving behavior
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Rolling resistance
Fuel efficiency
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | 36,2 | 29,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||