Segment
1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Upper-middle2. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Kleber) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Kleber is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (76%) than Kleber (75%). In this particular case, the Kleber KRISALP HP3 has a better rating of 89% compared to 86% of the Nokian WR D4. The first tyre test of Kleber KRISALP HP3 was done in 2017, compared to 2015 when was the Nokian WR D4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 185/65 R15 test, where both the KRISALP HP3 and the WR D4 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Kleber KRISALP HP3 | Nokian WR D4 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R19 | R13 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Upper-middle2. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle
1. Nokian WR D4 14.
1. Nokian WR D4 6.04
1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Exemplary2. Nokian WR D4 Highly recommended
2. Nokian WR D4 Recommended
2. Nokian WR D4 73%
2. Nokian WR D4 70%
2. Nokian WR D4 69%
2. Nokian WR D4 76%
2. Nokian WR D4 72%
1. Nokian WR D4 89%
1. Nokian WR D4 91%
2. Nokian WR D4 91%
1. Nokian WR D4 94%
1. Nokian WR D4 81%
2. Nokian WR D4 72%
1. Nokian WR D4 78%
2. Nokian WR D4 69%
2. Nokian WR D4 71%
2. Nokian WR D4 69%
2. Nokian WR D4 ? dB
2. Nokian WR D4 67%
2. Nokian WR D4 79%
1. Nokian WR D4 99%
1. Nokian WR D4 86%
1. Nokian WR D4 85%
2. Nokian WR D4 82%
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,8 | 2,1 | 1,9 | 2,2 | 2,6 | 1,5 | 1,6 |
Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Highly recommended | 2,3 | 2,1 | 2,5 | 2,5 | 2,6 | 2,0 | 2,2 |
Nokian WR D4 Rating: Recommended | 2,9 | 3,1 | 2,0 | 2,3 | 2,9 | 3,0 | 1,7 |
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1 | 1 | |||
Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | |||
Nokian WR D4 Rating: Satisfactory | 3 | 2- | 1 | 2 | |||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2,1 | 2,0 | 1,8 | 2,3 | 3,0 | 1,0 | 1,7 |
Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,6 | 2,4 | 1,9 | 2,3 | 3,1 | 2,0 | 2,0 |
Nokian WR D4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,9 | 2,5 | 1,8 | 2,5 | 3,4 | 3,0 | 1,7 |
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,3 | 27 | |||||
Kleber KRISALP HP3 | 35,9 | 27,1 | |||||
Nokian WR D4 | 37,3 | 27,6 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 1- | |||
Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 1- | 2 | |||
Nokian WR D4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2- | 2 | 3+ | |||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,2 | 25,9 | |||||
Kleber KRISALP HP3 | 35,7 | 26,7 | |||||
Nokian WR D4 | 35 | 27,7 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,8 | 1,7 | 1,7 | 2,1 | 3,0 | 1,5 | 1,7 |
Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Good | 2,5 | 2,3 | 2,1 | 2,5 | 3,3 | 2,0 | 2,0 |
Nokian WR D4 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 2,3 | 1,7 | 2,4 | 3,6 | 3,0 | 1,9 |
Show test details |