Segment
1. Nokian WR Snowproof Upper-middle2. Kormoran SNOW Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Kormoran) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Kormoran is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (52%) than Kormoran (14%). In this particular case, the Nokian WR Snowproof has a better rating of 55% compared to 6% of the Kormoran SNOW. The first tyre test of Kormoran SNOW was done in 2021, compared to 2019 when was the Nokian WR Snowproof first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 225/45 R17 test, where both the SNOW and the WR Snowproof were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kormoran SNOW has C wet grip rating, whereas 86% of Nokian WR Snowproof has B rating.
# | Kormoran SNOW
| Nokian WR Snowproof
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R15 - R18 | R14 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Nokian WR Snowproof Upper-middle2. Kormoran SNOW Lowcost
2. Kormoran SNOW 16.
2. Kormoran SNOW 38.
1. Nokian WR Snowproof 11.072. Kormoran SNOW 30.33
1. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory
1. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory
Name | Rating | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | dobré | 1,8 | 2,0 | ||||
Kormoran SNOW Rating: Poor | nedostatečné | 5,4 | 5,4 | ||||
Nokian WR Snowproof Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,4 | 3,2 | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,1 | ||||||
Kormoran Snow | 39,1 | ||||||
Nokian WR Snowproof | 36,5 | 29,2 | |||||
Show test details |