• 8 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Kumho Solus HA31 vs. Michelin CrossClimate+

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (80%) than Kumho (52%). In this particular case, the Michelin CrossClimate+ has a better rating of 71% compared to 31% of the Kumho Solus HA31. The first tyre test of Kumho Solus HA31 was done in 2016, compared to 2018 when was the Michelin CrossClimate+ first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 test, where both the Solus HA31 and the CrossClimate+ were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kumho Solus HA31 has C wet grip rating, whereas 97% of Michelin CrossClimate+ has B rating.

# Kumho Solus HA31
/31%
Michelin CrossClimate+
/71%

Add to comparison

DimensionsR13 - R18 R13 - R19
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Name WetDrySnowRunning costs
Best values in test2+2+2+1
Kumho Solus HA31
Rating: Satisfactory
2-2+ 22+
Michelin CrossClimate+
Rating: Exemplary
22+ 2+ 1
Show test details
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test39,546,3
Kumho Solus HA3143,849,5
Michelin CrossClimate+39,948,6
Show test details