Segment
1. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Upper-middle2. Maxxis Premitra HP5 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Maxxis) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Maxxis summer tyres are slightly better rated (51%) than Yokohama (32%). The first tyre test of Maxxis Premitra HP5 was done in 2017, compared to 2022 when was the Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the Premitra HP5 and the BLUEARTH-GT AE51 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Maxxis Premitra HP5 | Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R15 - R18 | R14 - R19 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Upper-middle2. Maxxis Premitra HP5 Lowcost
1. Maxxis Premitra HP5 Very good2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Sufficient
1. Maxxis Premitra HP5 Conditionally recommended2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Sufficient
Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 146 | 134 | |||||
Maxxis Premitra HP5 Rating: Highly recommended | 146 | 106 | |||||
Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Rating: Sufficient | 91 | 113 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
Maxxis Premitra HP5 | 37,3 | 28,9 | |||||
Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 | 37,7 | 32,2 | |||||
Show test details |