Segment
1. Michelin CrossClimate SUV Premium2. Nokian Weatherproof SUV Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (80%) than Nokian (52%). In this particular case, the Michelin CrossClimate SUV has a better rating of 83% compared to 19% of the Nokian Weatherproof SUV. The first tyre test of Michelin CrossClimate SUV was done in 2018, compared to 2016 when was the Nokian Weatherproof SUV first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 235/60 R18 test, where both the CrossClimate SUV and the Weatherproof SUV were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Michelin CrossClimate SUV has B wet grip rating, whereas 67% of Nokian Weatherproof SUV has A rating.
# | Michelin CrossClimate SUV | Nokian Weatherproof SUV | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R16 - R20 | R16 - R19 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin CrossClimate SUV Premium2. Nokian Weatherproof SUV Upper-middle
1. Michelin CrossClimate SUV Exemplary
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 2 | ||||
Michelin CrossClimate SUV Rating: Good | 2+ | 2+ | 2- | ||||
Nokian Weatherproof SUV Rating: Good | 2+ | 2- | 2 | ||||
Show test details |