Segment
1. Vredestein Sportrac 5 Premium2. Nokian Line Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian Line vs. Vredestein Sportrac 5
Table of contents:
| # | Nokian Line | Vredestein Sportrac 5 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
In this comparison, we will be focusing on two high-performance summer tyres, the Nokian Line which is manufactured in Finland (FI), and the Vredestein Sportrac 5. Both of these tyres provide versatile performance and are designed for optimal grip and safety on summer roads.
The Nokian Line is a tyre that is well-regarded for its performance. However, our rating for this tyre is at 35%, which indicates it has some room for improvement. This tyre did not have any previous models nor has it been replaced by any newer model yet. This tyre's performance in multiple tests ranks it around the middle of the pack. For instance, in the Autobild test, the Nokian Line secured the 14th position against 50 competitors. Similarly, in the ADAC test, it achieved the 6th position out of 16 tyres. With this data, it is unquestionable that the Nokian Line offers decent performance, but it may not necessarily be the top competitor in the arena of summer tyres.
On the other hand, the Vredestein Sportrac 5 has been rated significantly higher at 58% by our team. It has not been replaced by a newer tyre and did not have any previous models. This tyre has proven its excellent performance by achieving higher rankings in comparison tests than its counterpart. In Autobild's test, it was ranked 11th against 50 competitors, and impressively, in the ADAC's test, it bagged the 1st position against 16 other tyres. Considering these outstanding achievements, it is clear that the Vredestein Sportrac 5 outshines the Nokian Line in both individual performance and mutual test positions.
In summary, both the Nokian Line by Nokian and the Vredestein Sportrac 5 by Vredestein are reliable summer tyres. However, when compared based on the results from various tests, the Vredestein Sportrac 5 undoubtedly offers superior performance and takes the crown when pitted against the Nokian Line.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
2. Nokian Line 17.
Average position in tests
2. Nokian Line 12.17
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian Line Good
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian Line Good2. Vredestein Sportrac 5 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
2. Nokian Line 72%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
2. Nokian Line 79%
Wet handling
2. Nokian Line 87%
Wet circle cornering
2. Nokian Line 84%
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
2. Nokian Line 68%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
2. Nokian Line 78%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
2. Nokian Line ? dB
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Nokian Line Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 3 | ||||
| Vredestein Sportrac 5 Rating: Good | 2 | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,5 | 34,3 | |||||
| Nokian Line | 37,5 | 38 | |||||
| Vredestein Sportrac 5 | 36,8 | 37 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,5 | 0,5 | 1,5 | 1,6 | ||
| Nokian Line Rating: Good | 2,6 | 2,2 | 2,0 | 3,5 | 2,3 | ||
| Vredestein Sportrac 5 Rating: Good | 2,8 | 2,6 | 1,0 | 3,2 | 2,0 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Nokian Line Rating: - | 2- | 2- | 3 | ||||
| Vredestein Sportrac 5 Rating: Recommended | 2- | 2- | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,6 | 1,0 | 1,7 | 1,6 | ||
| Nokian Line Rating: Good | 2,3 | 1,7 | 2,5 | 3,6 | 1,8 | ||
| Vredestein Sportrac 5 Rating: Good | 2,0 | 1,8 | 2,0 | 3,3 | 2,1 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,6 | 27 | |||||
| Nokian Line | 37,9 | 29,1 | |||||
| Vredestein Sportrac 5 | 37,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||