• 10 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Nokian WR A4 vs. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Italy (Pirelli). Generally, Pirelli winter tyres are slightly better rated (68%) than Nokian (52%). In this particular case, the Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 has a better rating of 60% compared to 47% of the Nokian WR A4. The first tyre test of Nokian WR A4 was done in 2017, compared to 2015 when was the Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 245/45 R18 test, where both the WR A4 and the Winter Sottozero 3 were tested. See more mutual tests below.

# Nokian WR A4
/47%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
/60%

Add to comparison

DimensionsR16 - R21 R17 - R99
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Name WetDrySnowRunning costs
Best values in test2+1-2+1-
Nokian WR A4
Rating: Satisfactory
2-22-2
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
Rating: Satisfactory
3+22-2
Show test details
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test30,324,3
Nokian WR A434,625,5
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 335,225,8
Show test details
Name WetDrySnow
Best values in test1-2+2+
Nokian WR A4
Rating: Satisfactory
3+22-
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
Rating: Good
22-2+
Show test details
Name Points totalWinterWetDryRolling resistanceNoise
Best values in test203696544188
Nokian WR A4
Rating: Recommended
187644544 18 8
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
Rating: Recommended
190635642177
Show test details
Name WetDrySnowEnviromental impact
Best values in test9,69,29,910
Nokian WR A4
Rating: Still recommended
6,39,2 7,110
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
Rating: Still recommended
7,98,27,86,6
Show test details